|
PUBLISHER'S VIEWPOINT
September 2002
Eyeing the Future of Distribution
I
created a controversy back in 1987. I was invited to speak at
the annual meeting of the Foodservice Equipment Distributors
Association. I looked around the ballroom and prognosticated
that a third of the companies in the room would no longer exist
in 10 years. I based this wild assumption on a few simple
realities: Multiunit operators were increasingly controlling
foodservice (even then). There were too many dealers and rep
groups and manufacturers for what I saw as a maturing market. I
was wrong. And I was right.
I said the
distribution channel would consolidate, that a few
dealer-fabricator specialists would serve the big chains and
strong regional houses, allied with buying groups, which would
handle smaller multiunits and big independents. That there would
be niche specialists and bid houses. And that there would always
be folks working out of their garages, selling used equipment to
small independents. This structural arrangement is the part I
was right about, more or less.
I was wrong
about the market maturing, or at least maturing the way I
imagined. After the hiccup of the recession of 1990-91,
foodservice ramped up growth again. And while chains continued
to take increased share, a lot of the U.S. growth was driven by
smaller casual-dining operators. This kept many middle-market
dealers (and smaller manufacturers) in the game. Not that some
didn’t sell out. The broadliners have been especially aggressive
about consolidating. We also witnessed the “roll-up”
consolidation of a number of those strong regional dealers. But
according to Lebhar-Friedman’s <i>Directory of Foodservice
Distributors<i>, the number of E&S distributors has remained at
around 1,100 to 1,200 for the past 15 years. We may lose a few
in this downturn, but who knows.
So overall,
the channel doesn’t look that different than it did in ’87. And
that has me wondering whether maybe distribution looks the way
it does because it works this way. After all, domestic kitchen
design and supply is highly fragmented. And as I and the market
have gotten older, I realize that a lot of what happens comes
down to the personal relationships. A chain buyer does business
with a particular dealer because she knows she can count on him
to do it or fix it. A consultant always prefers to award the
contract to a certain bid house because they do the fab right
and get the job in. And ultimately, this is what it’s all about.
Cheers,

Robin Ashton
Publisher
|